<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>blog.iloaf.com &#187; Software</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.iloaf.com/category/software/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.iloaf.com</link>
	<description>Reflective Reality 3</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 14:46:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Firefox 3 - Is it really quicker?</title>
		<link>http://blog.iloaf.com/2008/07/05/firefox-3-is-it-really-quicker/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.iloaf.com/2008/07/05/firefox-3-is-it-really-quicker/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 14:03:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[~/]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[firefox3]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[performance]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[plugins]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[resources]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iloaf.com/?p=110</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[	One of the most popular things about firefox 3 is that the plugins provide so much useful extended functionality. This has got to be heavily responsible for it&#8217;s phenomenal success.

	I was reading firefox_answers on twitter earlier and it&#8217;s like a broken record. Plugins are to blame for everything apparently, yet there is no way of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>One of the most popular things about firefox 3 is that the plugins provide so much useful extended functionality. This has got to be heavily responsible for it&#8217;s phenomenal success.</p>

	<p>I was reading <a title="firefox_answers" href="http://twitter.com/firefox_answers" target="_blank">firefox_answers</a> on twitter earlier and it&#8217;s like a broken record. Plugins are to blame for everything apparently, yet there is no way of knowing which cause you resource issues when FF leaks like  the titanic.   It&#8217;s the fastest browser because X &#038; Y say so <strong>Yawn</strong> (Excuse me).</p>

	<p>Well I&#8217;ve not taken the pill yet, I&#8217;m running the portable version currently to test the waters.  But one thing I&#8217;ve not noticed is this apparent speed demon of a browser now it&#8217;s set up the way I like it.  So, I&#8217;d love to see the test results in a common configuration rather than minimal configuration with a handful of the most common plugins installed. Adblock with the juicy lists enabled, a search toolbar, download status bar, realplayer, bookmark manger like  del.icio.us and flash enabled.   Thoughts?</p>
 <div><a href="http://www.addthis.com/bookmark.php" onclick="window.open('http://www.addthis.com/bookmark.php?pub=&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.iloaf.com%2F2008%2F07%2F05%2Ffirefox-3-is-it-really-quicker%2F&amp;title=Firefox+3+-+Is+it+really+quicker%3F', 'addthis', 'scrollbars=yes,menubar=no,width=620,height=520,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,location=no,status=no'); return false;" title="Bookmark using any bookmark manager!" target="_blank"><img src="http://s3.addthis.com/button1-bm.gif" width="125" height="16" border="0" /></a></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.iloaf.com/2008/07/05/firefox-3-is-it-really-quicker/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
